My latest post is about the work of the German astronomer Johannes Kepler (1571-1630). He is most famous for his improvement to the earlier model of Copernicus by introducing the idea that the planets move in elliptical, rather than circular, orbits and that their movements in these orbits are governed by a set of laws, which became known as Kepler’s laws of planetary motion. However, as I’ll talk about later, he also made many other major contributions to astronomy and mathematics.

*Johannes Kepler – Image from Wikimedia **Commons*

As readers of a previous post will be aware, in 1543 the Polish astronomer Nicolas Copernicus (1473–1543) published a theory in which the Earth and all the planets orbited the Sun. Prior to Copernicus, the generally accepted view was that the Earth was the centre of the Universe and the Sun, the stars and the planets were all in motion around it. However, like all astronomers before him Copernicus believed that the planets’ orbits must be perfect circles. So, to make his theory fit the observations of the positions of the planets, each planet moved in a small circle called an epicycle and the centre of the epicycle was in orbit around the Sun. This is shown in the diagram below.

The fact that Copernicus’s model, like the geocentric model, still required epicycles gave it a rather complex and unsatisfactory feel. This complexity and the religious objections that Earth was not at the centre of the Universe were reasons why the model was not adopted more widely. Kepler made a huge advance by improving Copernicus’s model into the one we use today.

However, before I go onto talk about Kepler’s work, I’ll just give some background on ellipses, as I assume it may have been some time since many of my readers studied mathematics at high school. An ellipse is shown below and can be defined as a set of points where the sum of the distances from two other points, known as the focuses, is a constant.

In the diagram above: points A, B and C all lie on an ellipse, which is coloured purple. The two focuses of the ellipse are marked as F1 and F2. So:

- the sum of the lengths of the two green lines, which link A to each focus,
*is equal to* - the sum of the lengths of the two black lines ,which link B to each focus,
*and* - the sum of the lengths of the two red lines ,which link C to each focus.

The long axis (known as the major axis) passes through the centre of the ellipse and the focuses and is shown as the blue dashed line. The short axis (known as the minor axis) is at a right angle to this is and is shown as the red dashed line.

The other key feature of an ellipse is its eccentricity, which is a measure of how elongated an ellipse is. This is defined as the distance between the centre of the ellipse and either focus (the green line in the diagram above) divided by half the major axis (the brown line in the diagram above). The eccentricity is always between zero and one. An eccentricity just above zero is close to a perfect circle and an eccentricity just below one is a highly elongated ellipse.

**Kepler’s work**

Johannes Kepler was born in the town Weil der Stadt near Stuttgart in Germany. At the age of 18 he went to Tübingen University, which in Kepler’s time was one of the best universities in Germany. I understand that this is still the case today.

At Tubingen, Kepler studied philosophy, theology and astronomy. He learned both the Earth-centred Ptolemaic system (which was favoured by the church) and the rival heliocentric Copernican system. After considering the merits of both, he became a firm believer in the Copernican system.

When he left university, he began teaching mathematics and astronomy. In 1595 he published a book ‘Mysterium Cosmographicum’ defending Copernicus’s system. Interestingly although it was published over 50 years after Copernicus’s death, it was the earliest book defending this system. In 1600, as Kepler’s reputation as an astronomer spread, he was appointed as an assistant to the Holy Roman Emperor’s Imperial mathematician Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), based at the Prague observatory. Brahe was one of greatest astronomers before the invention of the telescope and had painstakingly gathered observations of the stars and planets over decades.

*Tycho Brahe – Image from Wikimedia **Commons*

Unlike Kepler, Brahe didn’t accept the Copernican system. Instead he invented a hybrid, a ‘geo-heliocentric’ system, in which the Sun and Moon orbited the Earth, while the planets orbited the Sun.

The year after Kepler’s appointment, Brahe died. This was good news for Kepler in two ways. Firstly, the Holy Roman Emperor appointed Kepler as the new imperial mathematician, which boosted both his prestige and his income. Secondly, it gave him unrestricted access to Brahe’s data.

Kepler tried to fit Brahe’s observations to Copernicus’s model. However he felt it was unwieldly that epicycles and multiple epicycles (for some planets) were needed to made the model work. He came up with the radical idea that, instead of moving in perfect circles, planets moved in ellipses. By doing this he was able to remove the need for epicycles altogether. To me this idea appears so simple that it is surprising no one had thought of it earlier. However, I suspect that earlier astronomers were constrained into believing that the heavenly bodies must move in perfect circles. In 1609 Kepler published his first two laws of planetary motion

**Kepler’s first law – **The planets move in ellipses with the Sun at one of the focuses of its ellipse.

His first law is shown in the diagram below.

- The point where the planet is closest to the Sun is called the perihelion.
- The point where it is furthest away is the aphelion.
- Half the length of the major axis is known as the semi-major axis. It is equal to the average of the planet’s closest distance from the Sun (perihelion) and its furthest distance from the Sun (aphelion).

**Kepler’s second law – **A line between the Sun and a planet sweeps out equal areas at equal times.

This is shown in the diagram below. As the planet moves around its orbit, it moves *faster* when it is closer to the Sun and *slower* when it is further away. However, the relationship between its speed and its distance from the Sun is such that the area of the triangle is always the same.

In 1619 Kepler published his third law of planetary motion, which relates the size of a planet’s orbit to its period, which is the time is it takes to complete an orbit around the Sun

**Kepler’s third law **– The square of the orbital period of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit.

The third law is useful because it allows the distance to a planet to be calculated. For example, if we take the Earth and Jupiter and measure the periods in **years** and distances in **astronomical units.**

- The Earth’s semi-major axis (R
_{E}) is 1 astronomical unit from the Sun - The time it takes the Earth to orbit the Sun (P
_{E}) is 1 year - The time it takes Jupiter to orbit the Sun (P
_{J}) is 11.86 years

*Where an astronomical unit is the mean distance between the Earth and the Sun.*

So, if we want to calculate the average distance between the Sun and Jupiter (R_{J}), then from Kepler’s third law.

(P_{J}/P_{E})^{2 }= (R_{J}/R_{E})^{3}

Putting the actual values in gives.

(11.86/1)^{2 }= (R_{J}/1)^{3}

So the average distance between the Sun and Jupiter (R_{J}) is the cube root of 11.86 squared which is 5.2 astronomical units.

**The Importance of Kepler’s laws**

Kepler’s three laws have shown to be fundamental laws of astronomy. Although Kepler derived them by analysing the planets’ orbits around the Sun, they apply to any object orbiting a larger body. This includes the orbits of moons around planets and artificial satellites around the Earth.

*The orbit of the International Space Station is governed by Kepler’s laws*

One thing Kepler was unable to provide was an adequate explanation as to the underlying reason about the planets’ motions and why they obeyed his laws. However, his work provided a springboard for Isaac Newton to develop his theory of gravitation later in the seventeenth century.

**Kepler’s****‘ Legacy**

Kepler’s improvement of Copernicus’s system lead to the more general acceptance of the heliocentric system. However this wasn’t his only contribution to science. He made many other contributions including: a new design of telescope, taking observations of a supernova and even has the distinction of writing the first ever science fiction story. I will talk about Kepler’s other work in my next post.

**The plural of focus is it focuses or foci?**

On a final note…

When I studied mathematics and physics at high school, we were taught that the plural of focus is foci. This is still the case in formal written British English. However, language changes over time and focuses is now much more commonly used nowadays. Certainly to use ‘foci’ in spoken English can sound affected. Therefore (after discussing the matter with Mrs Geek) I decided to use ‘focuses’ for the plural of focus.

vuurklip

said:I look forward to the next post!

LikeLiked by 1 person

thesciencegeek

said:Thanks it’s on its way, if can find the time away from the day job to complete it!

The Science Geek

LikeLiked by 1 person

Washe Koda

said:Interesting. I followed NASA’s mission named for him and never new, Thank-You for sharing

LikeLike

Tom Metcalfe

said:Reblogged this on The Somnium Project.

LikeLike

Steve Morris

said:Often the best ideas appear simple and obvious after they were invented! After Darwin published his theory of evolution, the biologist Thomas Huxley declared, ‘How stupid of me not to have thought of it!’

LikeLiked by 1 person

thesciencegeek

said:Very true !

We are all constrainted in our thinking by our education, culture etc.. I guess to 16 th century astronomers it would have been ‘obvious’ that heavenly bodies must move in perfectly circles

LikeLike

J.R. Handley

said:Great article! Thanks for posting.

LikeLiked by 2 people

thesciencegeek

said:Thank you

LikeLike

grahamd12014

said:Thanks for this interesting article, it demonstrates very clearly the relationship between mathematical thought and the ‘heavens’ as some would call planetary/celestial behaviour.

The interesting point being that a mathematical/ geometrical theory can then be applied, we think, universally to and that this leads to the concept of universally applicable ‘laws’, leading in turn to wider, philosophical questions as to why and how such laws come into being. From Kepler’s observation, which presumably he depended on Tycho Brahe’s previously collected data, he worked out such a set of useful laws, universally applicable and without which modern space exploration would be impossible.

One geometric question occurred to me – how are the focuses (foci?) of an ellipse determined?

Thanks

LikeLiked by 1 person

thesciencegeek

said:Thank you grahamd for your interesting observations. I’ll answer your two questions separately.

The easiest way of thinking about the focuses is to firstly consider a circle. A circle is a set of points which are all the same distance from another point (the centre).

An ellipse it the set of points where the sum of the distances from the two focuses is a constant. If we move the two focuses toghether so that they lie on the same point, then we get a circle. So an circle can be thought of as a special kind of ellipse with two focuses in the same place.

Focuses or Foci?When I studied mathematics and physics at high school, we were taught that the plural of focus is foci. This is still the case in formal written British English. However, the plural focuses is now much more commonly used nowadays and to use ‘foci’ in spoken English can sound slighted affected. This I why (after discussing the matter with Mrs Geek) I decided to use the word focuses for the plural of focus.

Drawing an ellipseThe link below gives a useful way of drawing an ellipse accurately using a pencil, string and two pins for the focuses.

http://www.finewoodworking.com/2006/04/11/a-precise-method-for-drawing-an-ellipse

LikeLike

bookheathen

said:By coincidence, I’ve just been revisiting Kepler’s and Newton’s ideas in connection with the development of the priciples of relativity. Interesting your comment about how ‘simple’ we sometimes find modern theories, forgetting the incredible amount of work that went into develping them.

BTW, it seems fairly clear that Kepler’s ‘Somnium’ was written (and published) before Cyrano’s sci-fi, but even so there are good arguments for placing the origins of the genre in ancient Greek and Hindu epics. I look forward to reading your next article.

LikeLiked by 1 person

thesciencegeek

said:Thank you for your interesting comment.

When Newton said his famous words:

” If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants”which, as I’m sure you already know, relates to his work building on the many discoveries made by earlier scientists, then clearly Kepler would have been a major giant.

The Science Geek

LikeLiked by 1 person

bookheathen

said:Indeed he would.

LikeLike

thelonelyauthorblog

said:Interesting post

LikeLike

J.S. Pailly

said:I didn’t realize Copernicus’s model still included epicycles. I guess the transition from geocentrism to heliocentrism was more of an evolutionary process than I thought.

LikeLiked by 1 person

thesciencegeek

said:Yes that’s, true to a degree, but essentially it was Kepler who made heliocentrism work.

The Science Geek

LikeLiked by 1 person

J.S. Pailly

said:Good to know! I guess I just figured Copernicus’s model was further along than it really was.

LikeLike

Pingback: Kepler’s other achievements | The Science Geek

Pingback: Johannes Kepler — The Science Geek | BisweswarSen

Kepler Remote

said:Very nice article!

Let me add that the third law was finalized on May 15 1618. Kepler wanted the printing of his Harmonices mundi libri V to happen in Germany but the Austrian Lords (paying for his work) wanted him to print it in Linz, so Publication was in 1619.

Nonetheless this year we celebrate 400 Years of the Third law of Kepler!

Yayy!

LikeLiked by 2 people

thesciencegeek

said:Thank you

LikeLike

Peace&Humanity

said:Very interesting article.

LikeLiked by 1 person